Charles Bentley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 261 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 4-4 In The Minors #5250
    Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
    Participant

      Brian – as a matter of interest I fist read about ‘bid the weaker 4-card minor’ in Paul Mendelson’s ‘The Right Way to Play Bridge’

      in reply to: 4-4 In The Minors #5249
      Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
      Participant

        Our agreement is on our card, Brian, but for sure only expert opponents ask. The same confusion arises with Julian’s system, doesn’t it, where opponents could lead a club believing there to be fewer clubs (as in Bernard’s system?
        Interested to hear what David thinks.
        And David, we play revolving discards (disclosed on our card) and I’m sure that gives us an advantage as weaker players never ask, or if they do, they don’t understand when we explain after 6D has been discarded in a 4S contract. ”We play revolving discards, so a low D asks for a club and a high D asks for a heart.” I hope this is OK.

        in reply to: Stayman over 2NT #5247
        Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
        Participant

          Julian, we play a variant of the Puppet Stayman you describe. After 2NT-3C-3D- we would bid 3NT with no 4 card suit (we’d been looking for 5/3 fit), 4C = 4/4 in majors and slam interest, 4D also = 4/4 in majors, but with no slam interest. Are these sound agreements?
          Also, do you ever play 2NT-3C-3D/3H/3S-P i.e. distress Stayman?
          And Brian asks about 2NT-3S. Is this best used for the minors (5+/5,?) or to show exactly 5 Ss and 4 Hs?
          Thanks

          in reply to: Up the Line #5232
          Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
          Participant

            Julian, I agree with what you’ve said, but what about two 4-card minors? If they are both of similar strength we bid 1C (like Bernard advises), but if Ds are xxxx or Hxxx we will bid the weaker suit, i.e. Ds, then they won’t lead it. Is this a sound agreement, please?

            in reply to: Responding to 3 level pre-empt #5153
            Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
            Participant

              Julian – would your four of a minor cue bid be 1st/2nd round control-showing or 1st round control (ace-void) please?

              in reply to: Bridge evaluation #5123
              Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
              Participant

                We use Stayman with 11HCP. With our Marty Bergen hand evaluation guidance, we knock a point off for a dubious doubleton, so only = 9HCP. 3 Aces & tens and 2 QJs, so no adjustment there and no five card suit. So pass. If playing at our clubs we’d have opened 1D, not 1NT, as that’s what the rest of the room would be doing!

                in reply to: Alert #4931
                Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                Participant

                  Yes of course, even more so with juniors (and some not so junior) who struggle to understand the impact on partner of long pauses etc. A quiet word to the teacher away from the table is effective.

                  in reply to: A Thin Slam #4930
                  Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                  Participant

                    Hi Nik. Yes, as we play, cue bid of 3S followed by 4S could in theory be a void, but not in this auction as you suggest. Even if responder had started cue bidding with the nice club holding, after 3S-4C I guess responder would then sign off with a void spade and all HCP in clubs opposite a singleton/void club and no outside entries. We would (never have!) only bid 2C-4C to show a solid six card club suit.

                    in reply to: Alert #4893
                    Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                    Participant

                      Mmmm. A not-needed alert could be perceived as unauthorized information.

                      in reply to: To bid or not to bid? #4892
                      Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                      Participant

                        3D? Don’t fancy 3NT gambling or pass

                        in reply to: Alert #4861
                        Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                        Participant

                          Not quite right. All artificial bids are alerted in the first round of bidding even if above 3NT, so 1S-P-4C splinter is alerted.

                          in reply to: A Thin Slam #4856
                          Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                          Participant

                            Our auction would be (OK, SHOULD be)
                            P
                            2C 23+ or any game force
                            2D negative or waiting
                            3H setting Hs as trumps
                            3S Italian cue bid (A, K, singleton, void)
                            4C as above
                            4S showing AK spades but denying D control
                            5H

                            in 5H or 6H, I’d take out trumps and cross to dummy for the D finesse

                            With ace-showing cue bids declarer would bid 4D after 3S and responder might sign off in 4H or bid 4S (showing AK) and declarer would sign off in 5H

                            in reply to: Harder Hand of the Week 0006 #4677
                            Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                            Participant

                              Nik, our partnership agreement is that a bid of a major in the 3rd seat in a competitive auction shows 5+ cards except after 1C-1D-

                              in reply to: Interesting teams bid #4645
                              Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                              Participant

                                likewise, I’m happy to share our very detailed system card (and receive feedback!) jbentley@jbentley.co.uk

                                in reply to: 1nt 12-14 #4600
                                Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                                Participant

                                  It’s fine. Listen to Bernard’s recent Quantitative Bidding seminar

                                Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 261 total)