Charles Bentley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 262 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bernard’s Seminar meets Real Life #5791
    Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
    Participant

      I don’t understand what point you are making here Brian…

      in reply to: Benji Acol vs 3 weak 2’s #5790
      Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
      Participant

        None of the juniors taught at our club are taught Benji. Having played Benji for 15+ years I absolutely do not regret changing to 3 weak twos 10 years ago.

        in reply to: Upload photo #5637
        Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
        Participant

          As a wildlife photographer I too know the problem of carrying heavy lenses.

          http://www.sharpphotography.co.uk

          in reply to: Weak with 12 points #5636
          Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
          Participant

            I’m surprised at David’s explanation. Is ‘Weak’ enough of a response? We say (in 3rd seat) ‘Weak to intermediate’. Why is the obligation on the enquirer to have to say ‘what do you mean by weak?’ or whatever. Would a weaker playres be brave enough? Isn’t this like when players respond (after 1NT-2H-) ‘multi-landy’ when it is more helpful to respond ‘5 hearts and 4+ of an undisclosed minor’? In our clubs, most of the better players are very good at explaining level-2/exotic conventions.

            in reply to: Asking what lead system my opponents play #5609
            Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
            Participant

              David, I though the correct way to ask was ‘Do you play standard leads?’ i.e. the ones printed on many club scorecards.

              in reply to: Upload photo #5607
              Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
              Participant

                You used to be a wedding photographer in Hampshire, Sean?

                With your sense of humour you might appreciate the caption in a recent issue of my wildlife photography magazine (from the early days of Bernard’s broadcasts):
                Not being able to get a haircut, Bernard had to use a stronger hairbrush
                hedgehog vignette

                in reply to: Upload photo #5541
                Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                Participant

                  I think Barbara is asking about your own photo, not inserting one into a discussion.  No idea how to do it, though Sean has managed it.

                  in reply to: Responding 3x stronger than responding 4x? #5540
                  Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                  Participant

                    I am surprised that Julian says you ‘nearly always have 5-card support’. We play 4-card majors and raise to 4 with 4-card support and 7 losers (< 12 HCP). Julian’s hand is 7 losers (no ace, but an extra trump). I thought eveyone did this. With 4 supporting trumps in a major, there is (I think) a better than >60% chance that 1H opener has 5 cards and >70% chance when she opens 1S.

                    in reply to: Bidding on Play Quiz 008 #5487
                    Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                    Participant

                      I guess Bertnard is constrained by not wanting to use Checkback at the moment. Hopefully he will cover this widely-used convention in future seminars. Using 2C checkback to find 5/3 and 3/5 major fits allows the bid of 3D in our partnerhsip agreement to show 5 good diamonds.

                      Here’s Julian explaining Checkback:

                      https://mrbridge.co.uk/library/single-magazine.html?issue=190#190/page/48-49

                       

                      in reply to: IMPs or Pairs #5480
                      Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                      Participant

                        I don’t understand the bidding. Why is N responding 1S with only 4 cards?

                        in reply to: Responding to 1NT after overcall of 2S #5479
                        Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                        Participant

                          We play double for take out and implying the other major (Hs). Even if you played Lebensohl 2NT, this hand would be too strong (more than 9 HCP). Without Lebensohl, a 3H bid is tricky to assess – is it weak and long or game-going? We play 3H as game force with 5Hs and 11+ HCP, but for me this hand = 10 HCP

                          in reply to: FSF #5477
                          Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                          Participant

                            Julia’s very busy, but you may find Julian will step in…

                            in reply to: 4-4 In The Minors #5407
                            Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                            Participant

                              I agree, Brian, very out-of-date apart from the one gem!

                               

                              in reply to: Stayman over 2NT #5406
                              Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                              Participant

                                Julian (and polite Brian) – as a matter of establishing BMB forum etiquette, are you happy to assume we are grateful and not post thank yous? It will keep the forum tidier!

                                in reply to: Is the double penalty or takeout #5404
                                Charles BentleyCharles Bentley
                                Participant

                                  I agree Brian – for me at teams and at pairs, the 2D bidder may have borrowed a King. So are we wrong? I would prefer to defend against 3D than 2D.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 262 total)