Julian Pottage

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1,141 through 1,145 (of 1,145 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2NT. with 20-=22 points #5007
    Julian PottageJulian Pottage
    Participant

      Unbalanced hands that are not quite strong enough for a game forcing opening are tricky in any system. I would feel uncomfortable about opening 2NT with a small singleton but if it is a singleton honour then a 2NT opening might be the best option. You would need to quote a specific hand for me to say for sure what I would open on it.

      in reply to: Self Declaring #5006
      Julian PottageJulian Pottage
      Participant

        If you are playing online, you self announce everything. Partner cannot see what you say, so there is no reason to worry about passing on unauthorised information. Regardless of whether you alert, opponents are allowed to ask about the meaning of a bid. Even if you make a natural bid, the opponents have right to know if you have agreed the strength of the bid – this would be the same online or not.

        in reply to: Responders rebid #5005
        Julian PottageJulian Pottage
        Participant

          Hello Angela,

          Your hand has 14 cards but whether you have 6 hearts or 7 I agree with your 2H rebid. Your hand is likely to make several tricks with hearts as trumps but be of little value in any other contract. I would play a 1NT rebid as stronger than 6 points – you do not have to bid twice with a minimum hand. Assuming the shape is 3-6-3-1, I would have no strong objection to passing 1S (a new suit after your 1-level response is non-forcing) but still think 2H is better. You would want 4-card spade support to raise to 2S.

          Julian

          in reply to: Hand evaluation #5003
          Julian PottageJulian Pottage
          Participant

            Hi Maire,

            Traditional point count says add 1 for a doubleton and 2 for a singleton, which has the same effect as counting for length. You would get 3 points for shape that way. If I knew of a fit, I would count 3 for the singleton rather than 2, which would give you 4 points for shape. Whether Bernard’s method gives 3 point or 4 for shape, I would not query it either way.

            What this hand us worth depends so much upon fit. If you open 1H and partner raises to 3H, you should be thinking of a slam. Give partner as little as this and slam has good play:

            S 43
            H 10987
            D A 4 2
            C 8 7 6 3

            Partner will obviously have a much better that that.

            Julian

            in reply to: Telling Our Opponents What To Lead #4913
            Julian PottageJulian Pottage
            Participant

              The main objective of bidding is to reach the correct contract. Occasionally in doing so you will tip the opponents off to the best lead. When it comes to slam bidding, it tends to be important to exchange information with your partner to check that you have the wherewithal not only to make twelve or more tricks but also to ensure the opponents cannot take two tricks first.

              On this particular deal I would regard the North hand as too good for a splinter. If you play a Jacoby 2NT response, I would do that. If you do not play Jacoby, North starts with a 3H jump shift and then after South rebids 3S North cue bids 4C agreeing spades – you never jump shift with a two-suited hand, which is how South knows 4C is a cue bid.

              The opponents would quite often find the diamond lead whatever your auction – if West has the king-queen or ace-king in the suit for example.

            Viewing 5 posts - 1,141 through 1,145 (of 1,145 total)